ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024
Noninvasive anatomical assessment for ruling out hemodynamically relevant coronary artery anomalies in adults - A comparison of coronary-CT to invasive coronary angiography: The NARCO study design.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single Coronary Artery in the Context of Vascular Disease: Anatomy, Development, Multimodality Imaging, and Clinical Interpretation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Coronary Artery Anomalies and Anatomical Variants: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Prevalence and characteristics of coronary anomalies in Bulgarian patients undergoing coronary angiography.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- The Role of MDCT Coronary Angiography in the Detection of Benign Varieties and Anomalies of Coronary Blood Vessels-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is a rare congenital heart disease, potentially leading to myocardial ischemia and adverse cardiac events. As the sole presence of AAOCA does not always imply a revascularization, a detailed anatomical and functional analysis is crucial for clinical decision-making. Currently, invasive coronary angiography is the gold-standard method for a thorough hemodynamic assessment of AAOCA. However, due to its invasive nature, the development of noninvasive diagnostic alternatives is desired. Methods: In the NARCO trial, patients with AAOCA will undergo coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to assess anatomical high-risk features followed by a vessel-based (i.e. invasive measurement with fractional flow reserve and intravascular imaging under a dobutamine-volume challenge) and a myocardium-based (i.e. nuclear imaging) ischemia testing. Comparison of noninvasive and invasive imaging will be performed. Additionally, explorative analysis of post-processing advanced computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 3D printing will be performed to unravel the pathophysiologic mechanism of myocardial ischemia in AAOCA. Aims: Our primary aim is to define characteristics of anatomical high-risk features (using CCTA) to rule out noninvasively hemodynamically relevant anomalous vessels in AAOCA patients. The secondary aim is to investigate the underlying pathophysiology of AAOCA-related hemodynamic relevance using advanced techniques such as CFD and 3D printing. Conclusions: The NARCO trial will help to optimize AAOCA patient selection for revascularization by improving risk stratification and ruling out hemodynamic relevance noninvasively and, therefore, preventing unnecessary downstream testing and/or costly interventions in patients with AAOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.