ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024
Case Report: Salvation of a congested SCIP flap with a modified "chemical leech" technique.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap is a widely accepted workhorse flap for covering defects. Although the success rate of SCIP flaps is currently high, flap failure occurs occasionally due to venous congestion. Venous re-anastomosis is the ideal rescue method but is sometimes limited by poor venule condition. The "chemical leech" technique could relieve venous congestion without venous re-anastomosis. However, owing to insufficient offloading, this technique is less effective in free flaps than in fasciocutaneous flaps, especially large-volume flaps. In this case report, we modified the "chemical leech" technique by adding a venous catheter. Congested blood was drained in a 2-way manner, both through a venous catheter and the skin incisions. On the first day, congested blood was mainly drained through the catheter. Intermittent heparin irrigation was required to maintain the blood flow. On days 2 and 3, as the microcirculation improved, the flow regulator was turned down to reduce blood loss. Blood loss through the catheter decreased dramatically from day 4 onward. This was probably due to thrombosis in and around the catheter. Another pathway through the skin still worked until the establishment of microcirculation, which occurred on day 8. Compared to previous "chemical leech" therapy, the modified "chemical leech" therapy was more reliable and could help drain the congested blood on venule level in addition to capillary level, making the blood drainage more efficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.