Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39634463›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Approach for participatory Delphi method for structuring voices, population empowerment and research training.

Jonathan Guillemot, Andrea Ortiz, Emilia Valdivieso, Gustavo Muñoz, Diego F Cisneros-Heredia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan GuillemotUniversidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina, Quito 170901, Ecuador.
Andrea OrtizUniversidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina, Quito 170901, Ecuador.
Emilia ValdiviesoUniversidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina, Quito 170901, Ecuador.
Gustavo MuñozUniversidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina, Quito 170901, Ecuador.
Diego F Cisneros-HerediaUniversidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Instituto de Biodiversidad Tropical IBIOTROP, Grupo de Ecología Urbana y Rural, Quito, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Delphi panel is a methodology used to generate consensus among experts. The development of a participatory Delphi approach consists of including the research population in the design and conduct of the research. It involves panelists in the preparation of an open-ended questionnaire as well as in the responding process. The answers are organized, anonymized and redistributed to produce a synthesis, which becomes a potential consensus statement. This process takes place during a set number of rounds in which the synthesis of each question is analyzed and graded by the panelists. Finally, syntheses are classified as having a higher, medium or lower consensus. We created a 'change-oriented' Delphi panel in which health-related students are considered the expert population. In this study, we propose a methodology to collect and analyze health-related students' views on education, demonstrating the effectiveness of active student participation and the Delphi approach in designing educational curricula.•This research focuses on how to conduct a Delphi participatory panel in which health-related students contribute to the study design, data collection, and analysis, as well as serving as the expert panelists.•This highly replicable methodology could be applied in the development of education curricula.•Delphi participatory approaches offer a research introduction opportunity.

Indexed as

Collaborative decision-makingConsensus buildingEducation curriculumHealth-related studentsParticipatory Delphi Method (PDM)

Identifiers

PMID39634463
PMCPMC11615886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.