Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39634461›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Optimized Methyl methacrylate embedding of small and large undecalcified bones.

Jackie A Fretz, Nancy W Troiano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jackie A FretzYale School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Nancy W TroianoYale School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methyl methacrylate (MMA) plastic embedding has been long established as a technique for the processing and histological assessment of bones. It provides the added benefit over paraffin in that it does not require decalcification of the tissue in order visualize the cellular detail, thus preserving vital information about the amount of unmineralized osteoid present in addition to the degree of mineralization in the bone. It also allows for the incorporation of dynamic histomorphometric analysis through the retention of fluorescent labels incorporated into the bone. Efficient infiltration of hard tissue is essential to the processing of bones and producing quality slides suitable for achieving usable quantifiable histology out the other end. This technique:•Updates previously published MMA embedding protocols to reflect utilization of stabilized acrylamides (over the unstabilized reagents of the past)•Outlines the techniques that are important for embedding both small (

Indexed as

BoneHistologyMethyl methacrylate embedding of small and large bonesMMAPlastic

Identifiers

PMID39634461
PMCPMC11615924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.