ArticleHeliyon2024
Change in mental health service utilization from pre- to post-COVID-19 period in the United States.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of State Medicaid Expansions Affecting Parental Eligibility on Children's Healthcare Access and Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic disparities, healthcare system trust, and social support in mental health treatment among U.S. adults with depressive or anxiety symptoms.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Article
- Healthcare utilisation, diagnosed depression and anxiety among US adults with diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes, 2021-2023: a national cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Desirable insurance coverage for electronic mental health services: a qualitative study on perspectives and preferences of university students and menta.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Gaps in psychiatric care before and after the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with depression using electronic health records.Psychiatry research · 2025Article
- Accessing mental health care: A population-level exploration of the impact of immigration duration in the United States 2019-2023.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to explore the change in mental health service utilization before and after the COVID-19 pandemic as well as determine the association of various sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities on the utilization pattern. Methods: Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2019 and 2022 were explored in this study. Along with the univariate analysis, bivariate analysis was conducted using the Chi-square and Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Stepwise binary logistic regression was implemented to find the best-fitted model and examine the effects of different factors on mental healthcare utilization. We also conducted a subgroup analysis for the variables that showed heterogeneous changes in utilization from 2019 to 2022. Results: Analysis of a total of 53,856 complete cases showed that the percentage of mental healthcare utilization changed from 20% in 2019 to 23.31% in 2022. Logistic regression results showed that the odds of mental health service utilization in the post-COVID period is 1.41 times of the pre-COVID [95% CI odds ratio (OR) = (1.26, 1.58)]. Sex, age, race, education, income group, insurance coverage, birth country, marital status, limitations of social functioning, having a place for healthcare, symptoms and history of depression/anxiety, diabetes, and hypertension had significant effects on the odds of receiving mental healthcare. Subgroup analysis revealed that the utilization changed significantly from 2019 to 2022 for age group "18-34" [OR = 1.41, 95% CI = (1.26, 1.58)], "35-49" [OR = 1.35, 95% CI = (1.21, 1.50)], and "50-64" [OR = 1.12, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.24)], while for the age group "above 64" was not significant. Conclusion: Pre- and post-COVID periods were found to be significantly different in terms of the utilization of mental healthcare utilization. Changes in the utilization was also found to differ in terms of different age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.