ReviewNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2024
Fourier imaging for nanophotonics.
Review in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strong light-matter interactions in hybrid polaritonic systems.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- A directional nanoantenna design based on a hybrid plasmonic waveguide: theoretical analysis for biosensing applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Decoding chirality at the nanoscale with momentum-space polarimetry.Light, science & applications · 2026Article
- Multiplexed back focal plane imaging with on-chip integrated microlens array.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Spatially-Controlled Planar Guided Crystallization of Low-Loss Phase Change Materials for Programmable Photonics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard optical characterization and spectroscopy techniques rely on the measurement of specular reflection, transmission, or emission at normal incidence. Although the usefulness of these methods is without question, they do not provide information on the angular dependence of the scattered light and, therefore, miss crucial insights on the physical processes governing light emission and scattering. In this Review, we explain the basics of Fourier imaging and show how it can be used to measure the angular distribution of scattered light in single-shot measurements. We then give a comprehensive panorama on recent research exploiting this technique to analyze nanostructures and detail how it unlocks fundamental understandings on the underlying physics of nanophotonic structures. We finally describe how simple additions to a Fourier imaging setup enable measuring not only the radiation pattern of an object but also the energy, polarization, and phase toward resolving all aspects of light in real time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.