Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39634339›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2024

NOS3 regulates angiogenic potential of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells.

Anne M Kong, Zulhusni A Idris, Daniel Urrutia-Cabrera, Jarmon G Lees, Ren Jie Phang, Geraldine M Mitchell, Raymond C B Wong, Shiang Y Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne M KongO'Brien Institute Department, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia.
Zulhusni A IdrisO'Brien Institute Department, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia.
Daniel Urrutia-CabreraDepartments of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Medicine, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jarmon G LeesO'Brien Institute Department, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia.
Ren Jie PhangO'Brien Institute Department, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia.
Geraldine M MitchellO'Brien Institute Department, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia.
Raymond C B WongDepartments of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Medicine, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Shiang Y LimO'Brien Institute Department, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporation of blood capillaries in engineered tissues and their functional connection to host blood vessels is essential for success in engineering vascularized tissues, a process which involves spatial patterning of endothelial cells (ECs) to form functional and integrated vascular networks. Different types of ECs have been employed for vascular network formation and each source offers advantages and disadvantages. While ECs derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-ECs) offer advantages over primary ECs in that they can be generated in large quantities for autologous applications, their suitability for disease modelling and cell replacement therapies is not well-explored. The present study compares the angiogenic capacity of iPSC-ECs and primary ECs (cardiac microvascular ECs and lymphatic microvascular ECs) using an

Indexed as

CRISPREndothelial cellsInduced pluripotent stem cellsNOS3Tubulogenesis

Identifiers

PMID39634339
PMCPMC11616527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.