ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: When consumed in appropriate quantities, probiotics, which are live microorganisms, are good for health. In this study, a mouse model of antibiotic-induced dyskinesia was established using a sterile mixed antibiotic solution to investigate the preventive impact of Methods: Following modeling, alterations in the serum and brain tissue of mice were assessed for motor measures such as running and swimming, malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase, reduced glutathione, interleukin (IL-6, IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. The mouse cecum was used to evaluate the relative mRNA expression levels of the intestinal barrier genes, namely occludin-1, zona occludens-1 (ZO-1), and claudin-1. The relative mRNA expression levels of cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genes in the mouse brain tissue were also evaluated. Results: Compared with the model group, LFZS09 considerably increased the swimming and running duration of mice, significantly decreased the levels of the inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-6 and increased SOD expression in the mouse brain, and decreased MDA accumulation in the mouse brain and serum. Furthermore, LFZS09 upregulated occludin-1 gene expression in the cecal tissue to maintain the intestinal barrier, which in turn maintained the normal physiological function of the body. LFZS09 also enhanced the effect of BDNF and increased the expression of BDNF metabolic pathway-related genes, namely CREB, ERK1/2, and BDNF, in the mouse brain tissue. LFZS09 increased the number of Conclusion: The findings indicate that LFZS09 regulates antibiotic-induced motor impairment in mice, thereby offering a theoretical foundation for future studies and probiotic or parabiotics production aimed at augmenting motor function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.