ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Can a smoking cessation app benefit individuals in disadvantaged areas? A qualitative study on motivation, barriers, and perceptions of a digital app.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In Sweden, the prevalence of daily smoking has decreased substantially over the past few decades. However, a socioeconomic divide is evident, contributing to health inequities. The current study focuses on the needs, facilitators, and barriers in relation to quitting smoking among individuals in disadvantaged areas and explores their perception of digital tools for smoking cessation. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 participants in Stockholm County between 2022 and 2023. Participants were recruited through health care centres, dental clinics, and civil society actors. A thematic analysis was performed. Results: Two cross-cutting main themes were identified; 1) Motivational factors and barriers in smoking cessation, including the subthemes "health, concern for loved ones and economic aspects" and "emotional, environmental, and cultural barriers" and 2) Benefits and limitations of a digital tool for smoking cessation, including the subthemes"important/relevant features in a digital app" and "limitations of digital support". Conclusions: The results reveal that most participants want to quit smoking but perceive it as difficult. The study highlights the importance of addressing social disparities in smoking and the need for accessible smoking cessation support. While mobile apps are viewed as promising for smoking cessation by some of the participants, scepticism exists among others. Moving forward, personalized approaches that integrate digital tools with traditional methods for smoking cessation can be important to reduce smoking prevalence. Ensuring accessibility of effective smoking cessation support for all is a key public health interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.