Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39634167›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2024

Patients' experience of care index: A new, reliable, and useful questionnaire in lumbar spine surgery.

Arkan Sam Sayed Noor, Björn Knutsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arkan Sam Sayed NoorClinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, University City Rd, University City, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Björn KnutssonDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient's experience of care (PEC) is crucial in enhancing and sustaining healthcare quality. Research question: the primary aim of this study is to establish and assess a new questionnaire index designed to measure PEC following elective spinal surgery. This index serves as a tool to document, enhance, and maintain the quality of healthcare provided in this context. Material and methods: The studied PEC index comprises 7 questions, each addressing different aspects of perioperative care. Our study involved 300 post-spinal surgery patients, sourced from the Swedish national register for spine surgery. Collected data included age, gender, education level, self-rated health, and primary language. The patients were contacted via telephone by trained interviewers, approximately 35 days after their surgery (with 60 patients re-interviewed after a few weeks). We employed linear regression, Results: The PEC index demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.76, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.87). Additionally, the utility measures indicated associations between the PEC index and factors such as higher age (p = 0.014), male gender (p = 0.012), and better self-rated health (p = 0.011). Discussion and conclusion: The PEC index seems to be a promising tool with a clinically useful composite questionnaire for assessing PEC in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. In clinical settings, the index can accompany other outcome scores to evaluate and compare different diagnoses and management methods.

Indexed as

IndexPatient satisfactionPerception of careReliabilitySpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID39634167
PMCPMC11616567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.