Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39634099›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) with external ultrafiltration membrane for the treatment of sugar beet vinasse.

Beatriz Egerland Bueno, André Luiz Muniz Brito, Victor S Garcia Rea, Rifki Wahyu Kurnianto, Marcelo Zaiat, Jules B van Lier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beatriz Egerland BuenoBiological Processes Laboratory, Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
André Luiz Muniz BritoSanitary Engineering Section, Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Victor S Garcia ReaSanitary Engineering Section, Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Rifki Wahyu KurniantoSanitary Engineering Section, Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Marcelo ZaiatBiological Processes Laboratory, Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Jules B van LierSanitary Engineering Section, Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vinasse, a by-product of ethanol production, is generated at significant rates. While rich in nutrients such as calcium, magnesium, and potassium, its high solids, organic matter, acidity, and sulfate content pose challenges when disposed directly on soil, necessitating treatment. Anaerobic digestion is a viable solution, reducing organic pollution while recovering energy in the form of biogas, aligning with the biorefinery concept. Traditionally, sludge bed reactors and anaerobic contact reactors are utilized for vinasse processing, with sludge granulation being vital for treatment success. However, challenges such as sludge wash-out due to recalcitrant compounds, high solids concentration in the influent, low pH, salinity, and temperature hinder granule formation. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) offer an alternative, simplifying treatment by integrating intensified pre- and post-treatment units. Due to complete sludge retention, AnMBRs achieve high COD removal efficiencies, yielding a suspended solids-free and largely disinfected effluent. Therefore, AnMBRs show promise for vinasse treatment, eliminating the need for sludge granulation and producing nutrient-rich effluent with minimal residual organics and suspended solids. In this study, an AnMBR equipped with an inside-out external crossflow ultrafiltration membrane was proposed for the treatment of vinasse. The AnMBR reached a COD removal efficiency of 95% ± 2.6% and produced 0.3 CH

Indexed as

anaerobic digestionbeet vinassefluxhelix membraneultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID39634099
PMCPMC11615572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.