ReviewFrontiers in plant science2024
Bibliometric analysis of research trends and advancements in medicinal plant microbiome.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Changing research trends in seed responses to stresses: a bibliometric analysis over the last 50 years.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Pooled it
- Roles of gas molecules and related factors in knee cartilage injury and repair: a bibliometric visualization analysis of research hotspots.Medical gas research · 2026Review
- Global research trends and hotspots of plant physiologically active substances: quantitative visualization analysis based on CiteSpace.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Phytochemical and Medicinal Plant Research in Chile: Status, Opportunities, and Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diversity and distribution of the microbiome in the bulbs and rhizosphere soil ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Wild and Domesticated Seeds on the Colonization of Rhizosphere Microorganisms in Atractylodes lancea.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Feasibility analysis and development trend of nanomaterials for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.Discover nano · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medicinal plants and microorganisms are closely linked, with microorganisms boosting plant growth, offering pest control, and enhancing secondary compound production. However, there's a lack of systematic research, detailed molecular studies, and standardized methods for effectively using microorganisms in developing products from medicinal plants. To enhance understanding of the present research progress, emerging patterns, and key areas pertaining to microorganisms found in medicinal plants, CiteSpace bibliometric software was employed to visualize and analyze 1269 English publications sourced from the Science Net Core Collection database. Through the utilization of keyword co-occurrence analysis and cluster analysis methods, this study seeks to explore collaborative networks among countries, institutions, and scholars involved in the study of microorganisms in medicinal plants. This review highlights key research areas in microbiology, focusing on evaluating natural compounds for antibacterial properties and the impact of secondary metabolites on microbial communities, aiming to highlight significant research domains and primary focuses for researchers and professionals engaged in the field of microbiology concerning medicinal plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.