ArticleNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2024
Generic characterization method for nano-gratings using deep-neural-network-assisted ellipsometry.
Article in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-based analysis algorithm incorporating nanoscale structural variations and measurement-angle misalignment in spectroscopic ellipsometry.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Neural network-based analysis algorithm on Mueller matrix data of spectroscopic ellipsometry for the structure evaluation of nanogratings with various optical constants.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Enabling new frontiers of nanophotonics with metamaterials, photonic crystals, and plasmonics.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a non-destructive and rapid technique, optical scatterometry has gained widespread use in the measurement of film thickness and optical constants. The recent advances in deep learning have presented new and powerful approaches to the resolution of inverse scattering problems. However, the application of deep-neural-network-assisted optical scatterometry for nanostructures still faces significant challenges, including poor stability, limited functionalities, and high equipment requirements. In this paper, a novel characterization method is proposed, which employs deep-neural-network-assisted ellipsometry to address these challenges. The method processes ellipsometric angles, which are measured by basic ellipsometers, as functional signals. A comprehensive model is developed to profile nano-gratings fabricated by diverse techniques, by incorporating rounded corners, residual layers, and optical constants into an existing model. The stability of the model is enhanced by implementing several measures, including multiple sets of initial values and azimuth-resolved measurements. A simple compensation algorithm is also introduced to improve accuracy without compromising efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can rapidly and accurately characterize nano-gratings fabricated by various methods, with relative errors of both geometric and optical parameters well controlled under 5 %. Thus, the method holds great promise to serve as an alternative to conventional characterization techniques for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.