ArticleMatrix biology plus2024
Investigation of neuro-regenerative therapeutic potential of nerve composite matrix hydrogels embedded with adipose-derived stem cells.
Article in Matrix biology plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Convergence research in matrix biology and biomaterials science.Matrix biology plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) induces permanent sensorimotor deficit below the site of injury. There is various research conducted to provide effective therapy, however, SCI is still considered incurable due to the complex nature of the injury site. Recently, our lab developed a combinatorial therapeutic for SCI repair comprising human adipose-derived stem cell (hASC)-embedded nerve composite hydrogels using different ratios of decellularized sciatic nerve (dSN) and spinal cord (dSC) matrices. This study investigated angiogenic and neurotrophic effects of the combinatorial therapeutic in vitro. Compression testing was performed to analyze mechanical properties of the composite hydrogels and showed no significant difference between all hydrogel groups. Next, pro-angiogenic factors and neurotrophins secreted from hASCs within different ratios of the composite hydrogels were analyzed and we found culture durations and extracellular matrix (ECM) composition affect secretory behavior. Interestingly, ECM compositional difference between hydrogel groups had little influence on human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBVECs) infiltration and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurite outgrowth. Finally, we conducted proteomic analysis to identify the ECM components potentially contributing to these observed effects. Taken together, dSN:dSC = 1:2 hydrogel showed slightly better therapeutic potentials, warranting validation using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.