ArticleJournal of thermal analysis and calorimetry2024
A thermodynamic investigation into protein-excipient interactions involving different grades of polysorbate 20 and 80.
Article in Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Organic Solvents, Surfactants, and Nonfunctionalized PEGs on PEGylation Reaction Yield.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Molecular biophysics of viral proteins: From mechanistic insights to microbiological and clinical applications.AIMS microbiology · 2026Review
- Pharmaceutical Analysis of Protein-Peptide Coformulations and the Influence of Polysorbates.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing stable biopharmaceutical formulations is of paramount importance and is typically achieved by incorporating surfactants as stabilising agents, such as polysorbate 20 and 80. However, little is known about the effect surfactant grade has on formulation stability. This study evaluates the effect of regular grade and Super-refined™ polysorbates 20 and 80 and their interaction with model proteins, namely β-lactoglobulin (β-Ig), human serum albumin (HSA) and immunoglobulin gamma (IgG), using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). ITC results indicated that all four polysorbates underwent binding interactions with β-Ig and HSA, yet no interaction was observed with IgG this is postulated to be a consequence of differences in secondary structure composition. Surfactant binding to β-Ig occurred at ratios of ~ 3:2 regardless of the surfactant used with dissociation constants ranging from 284 to 388 µM, whereas HSA bound at ratios of ~ 3:1 and dissociation constants ranging from 429 to 653 µM. Changes in enthalpy were larger for the surfactant interactions with HSA compared with β-Ig implying the former produced a greater binding interaction than the latter. DSC facilitated measurement of the temperature of unfolding of each protein with the presence of each polysorbate where results further confirmed interactions had occurred for β-Ig and HSA with an increased unfolding temperature between 4 and 6 K implying improved protein stability, yet again, no interaction was observed with IgG. This study thermodynamically characterised the role of polysorbates in protein stabilisation for biopharmaceutical formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.