ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2024
Preferences and expectations of end-users from a mental health educational portal: A qualitative study.
Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Makes Mobile Banking Difficult for Older Adults? A Multi-Layer Usability Investigation.Health promotion perspectives · 2026Article
- User Experience and Early Clinical Outcomes of a Mental Wellness Chatbot for Depression and Anxiety: Pilot Evaluation Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The relationship between uploader identity and the quality and reliability of depression-related Chinese short videos on TikTok and Bilibili.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital technologies play an essential role in health systems by providing new solutions to reduce the burden of mental illnesses and disorders. However, in many cases, user preferences and expectations are not considered in the design of portals. This study aims to explore the preferences and expectations of end-users from the features and capabilities of mental health educational portals. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted from January 2022 to January 2023 using the conventional content analysis approach. The participants were 20 individuals, selected through purposive sampling, ranging in age from 18 to 61, all of whom had prior experience using an educational portal. Data were collected via individual semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was performed using MAXQDA 10 software. Results: After analyzing the data, the preferences and expectations of end-users were categorized into five main themes: to be reliable, mutual interaction capability, to be accessible, creating a stylish and attractive design, and attention to the quality and structure of the content. Conclusion: Considering the expectations and needs of users will enhance their acceptance and satisfaction with the portals. From the end-users' perspectives, the content, appearance, and structural or technical features a mental health educational portal are crucial for its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.