Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2024
Automated ultrasonographic pupillary assessment: a new neuro-ophthalmological assessment tool.
Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of automated ultrasound pupillometry assessment vs. infrared pupillary in critically ill patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate correlations between ultrasonographic pupillary assessment (UPA) and automated UPA in neurocritical patients.
methodsThis was a prospective, observational study of 20 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with neurological pathology. Between UPA and automated UPA, 40 pupillary measurements were made. The time required to conduct UPA and automated UPA on a single patient was consistently < 3 minutes. Automated UPA required a markedly shorter operational time than UPA.
resultsThere were strong positive associations between UPA and automated UPA measurements, with the following correlations: right eye at rest,
conclusionsAutomated UPA was strongly correlated with UPA in neurocritical patients. Automated UPA is a rapid, feasible, and noninvasive method that enables the precise evaluation of pupillary size and light response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.