Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633587›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2025

The Efficacy of Anlotinib Plus Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Multiple Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study.

Lipin Liu, Yonggang Xu, Hong Gao, Ting Zhao, Dazhi Chen, Jingyi Jin, Cui Gao, Gaofeng Li, Qiuzi Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lipin LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3893-4661
Yonggang XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Hong GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Ting ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Dazhi ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Jingyi JinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Cui GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Gaofeng LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Qiuzi ZhongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding BJ-2021-183National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding BJ-2023-193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of anlotinib plus whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with that of WBRT alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with multiple brain metastases (BMs).

methodsThe clinical data of patients with NSCLC and multiple BMs who received WBRT between 2019 and 2022 were collected. The patients were assigned to anlotinib plus WBRT group and WBRT group according to the treatment used.

resultsA total of 64 patients were eligible for analysis; 21 were treated with anlotinib plus WBRT, and 43 were treated with WBRT. The anlotinib plus WBRT group had a greater proportion of patients who were young and had a better performance status and adenocarcinoma histology than did the WBRT group. The median follow-up time was 18.0 months. The median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) was significantly longer in the anlotinib plus WBRT group than in the WBRT group (12.9 months vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.004). The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 months in the anlotinib plus WBRT group and 9.4 months in the WBRT group (p = 0.039). Considering death as a competing risk to intracranial progression, the 1-year cumulative incidence of intracranial progression in the anlotinib plus WBRT group (26.7%) was significantly lower than that in the WBRT group (64.3%) (p = 0.021). There was no significant difference in treatment-related toxicity between the anlotinib plus WBRT group and the WBRT group.

conclusionCompared with WBRT alone, anlotinib plus WBRT might confer superior intracranial PFS for NSCLC patients with multiple BMs without increasing treatment-related toxicity.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCranial IrradiationIndolesLung NeoplasmsQuinolinesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeanlotinibIndolesQuinolinesanlotinibbrain metastasesnon‐small cell lung cancerwhole‐brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39633587
PMCPMC11729404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.