Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633501›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Effects of deliberate practice and structured feedback in psychotherapy training (DeeP): a study protocol of a randomized-control-trial.

Anna Berning, Stefan Sell, Wiebke Andersen, Bernhard Strauß, Svenja Taubner

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna BerningInstitute for Psychosocial Prevention, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Anna.Berning@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Stefan SellInstitute for Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Wiebke AndersenMAPP-Institute, Magdeburg, Germany.
Bernhard Strauß *Institute for Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Svenja Taubner *Institute for Psychosocial Prevention, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychotherapeutic competencies encompass a variety of skills that influence the work and therapeutic success of psychotherapists. In particular, interpersonal skills and the associated ability to react appropriately in complex therapy situations have already shown significant correlations with later therapeutic success. Strengthening interpersonal skills should therefore be a central aim of psychotherapy training. However, previous studies have shown that not only content learning is decisive for later learning success and skill development, but also the didactic method has a significant effect. Deliberate Practice and Structured Feedback have shown to be promising didactic tools. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of Deliberate Practice and Structured Feedback as well as their combination in the context of psychotherapy training in comparison to classic didactic training. The trainees' learning progress of interpersonal skills and its influence on subsequent outpatient therapies will be examined. Secondary, the study aims to identify further determinants of trainees' therapeutic skills and to investigate the effects of ruptures on the course of therapy.

methodsThe underlying study, a randomized-control-trial with three intervention groups (Deliberate Practice, Structured Feedback, combination of both) and an active control group, will be conducted on a sample of N = 240 trainees and their patients (N = 1000). All trainees will each attend three consecutive workshops on "Strengthening therapeutic skills in challenging therapy situations", which will be carried out using the corresponding didactic tool. Scientific assessments will take place online for the trainees (pre, in-between, post, follow-up) and for the patients (after each therapy session for 24 weeks, follow-up). Primary outcomes will be constituted by the trainees' Facilitative Interpersonal Skills and the patients' symptoms. Multilevel as well as structural equation modelling will be used to analyze the data. DISCUSSION: The study investigates the efficacy of different didactic tools regarding the strengthening of trainee's interpersonal competencies as well as their effects on subsequent therapies. Results of this study address a research gap concerning the improvement of psychotherapy training as well as the quality assurance of future therapies.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) - DRKS00034279; retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePsychotherapyAdultFeedbackFormative FeedbackHumansMalePsychotherapistsSocial SkillsInterpersonal competencePsychotherapy trainingRandomized-control-trialRupture-repairTherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID39633501
PMCPMC11616299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.