Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633436›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2024

DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections-One week to save the joint?

Vatsal Gupta, Shafiq Shahban, Michael Petrie, Peter K Kimani, Jakub Kozdryk, Bryan Riemer, Richard King, Richard Westerman, Pedro Foguet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vatsal GuptaUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK. vatsalg001@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8644-2453
Shafiq ShahbanUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Michael PetrieUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Peter K KimaniWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Jakub KozdrykUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Bryan RiemerUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Richard KingUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Richard WestermanUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Pedro FoguetUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting the success of a Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR) procedure for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) for hip and knee joint arthroplasty remains a challenge. A failed DAIR might adversely affect the outcome of any future revision surgery for PJI. Hence, the ability to identify and optimize factors predictive of DAIR success would help target the procedure to the appropriate patient cohort and avoid unnecessary surgery for patients where a DAIR is unlikely to eradicate infection.

methodsA retrospective review of our prospective Bone Infection Group database was performed to identify all patients who underwent a DAIR of their primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty. All patients had a confirmed PJI as per MSIS 2013 criteria and an outcome according to the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. DAIR surgery was then grouped into groups of "successful" or "unsuccessful" outcomes.

resultsSixty-four consecutive patients with an acute PJI underwent a DAIR procedure between 2009 and 2020, with 46 procedures performed for knees and 18 for hips. Treatment was successful in 69% (37 knees and 7 hips). The chance of a successful DAIR was significantly greater if performed at or within one week of symptom onset compared to greater than one-week duration (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.11; P = 0.027; 95% CI [0.02-0.78])). For DAIR performed at or within one week of symptom onset, the success rate was 93% for knees and 80% for hips. The chance of a successful DAIR however was not influenced by whether the surgeon was an arthroplasty or non-arthroplasty surgeon (OR 0.28; P = 0.13; 95% CI [0.05-1.48])). Isolated Streptococcus infection had a success rate of 100%. Next came Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (71%) and Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (65%). Polymicrobial infection had the worst outcome, with a success rate of 40%.

conclusionIn our experience, DAIR surgery performed within one week of symptom onset significantly increased the chance of successful infection eradication. Collaborative work is required to ensure arthroplasty patients can access prompt appropriate surgical decision-making as soon as concerns arise, remove barriers to early assessment and minimise delays to surgery.

Indexed as

AntibioticsDAIRDebridementHip arthroplastyImplant retentionInfectionKnee arthroplastyPeriprosthetic joint infectionRevision

Identifiers

PMID39633436
PMCPMC11619623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.