Automated derivation of diagnostic criteria for lung cancer using natural language processing on electronic health records: a pilot study.

backgroundThe digitisation of healthcare records has generated vast amounts of unstructured data, presenting opportunities for improvements in disease diagnosis when clinical coding falls short, such as in the recording of patient symptoms. This study presents an approach using natural language processing to extract clinical concepts from free-text which are used to automatically form diagnostic criteria for lung cancer from unstructured secondary-care data.

methodsPatients aged 40 and above who underwent a chest x-ray (CXR) between 2016 and 2022 were included. ICD-10 and unstructured data were pulled from their electronic health records (EHRs) over the preceding 12 months to the CXR. The unstructured data were processed using named entity recognition to extract symptoms, which were mapped to SNOMED-CT codes. Subsumption of features up the SNOMED-CT hierarchy was used to mitigate against sparse features and a frequency-based criteria, combined with univariate logarithmic probabilities, was applied to select candidate features to take forward to the model development phase. A genetic algorithm was employed to identify the most discriminating features to form the diagnostic criteria.

results75002 patients were included, with 1012 lung cancer diagnoses made within 12 months of the CXR. The best-performing model achieved an AUROC of 0.72. Results showed that an existing 'disorder of the lung', such as pneumonia, and a 'cough' increased the probability of a lung cancer diagnosis. 'Anomalies of great vessel', 'disorder of the retroperitoneal compartment' and 'context-dependent findings', such as pain, statistically reduced the risk of lung cancer, making other diagnoses more likely. The performance of the developed model was compared to the existing cancer risk scores, demonstrating superior performance.

conclusionsThe proposed methods demonstrated success in leveraging unstructured secondary-care data to derive diagnostic criteria for lung cancer, outperforming existing risk tools. These advancements show potential for enhancing patient care and results. However, it is essential to tackle specific limitations by integrating primary care data to ensure a more thorough and unbiased development of diagnostic criteria. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of contextualising SNOMED-CT concepts into meaningful terminology that resonates with clinicians, facilitating a clearer and more tangible understanding of the criteria applied.