ArticleBMC health services research2024
The portfolio effect: an opportunity for improving handoffs quality in ICU.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of clinical handover among ICU nurses based on the structured ISBAR model (2025).BMC nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHandoffs are a major determinant of patient's safety but their implementation remains heterogeneous and non-standardized. Organizational factors, including the order in which individual cases are handled within the handoff, may play a role in their quality. We aimed to confirm the existence of the portfolio effect (e.g. a decrease in duration allocated to individual cases as the global handoff progresses) in ICU's morning medical handoffs.
methodsTwo research assistants observed the morning handoffs in two ICUs (ICU-1, a 20-bed trauma and surgical ICU and ICU-2 a 10-bed medical and surgical ICU) within a university hospital, over a 6-month period. They were trained to measure the duration of each case (i.e., the handoff of a single patient). Patients' socio-demographic and clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. The effect of the case position within the global handoff on its duration was determined using a linear regression after log transformation of duration. The case position was categorized as either before or after the median position (first and second halves). Covariates clinically associated with handoff duration were included in the model (age, sex, Charlson comorbidities index, SAPS II score, number of organ supports, center (ICU-1 or ICU-2) and reason for admission).
results2485 individual cases nested in 169 morning handoffs and related to 494 patients' stays were observed. The mean (± SD) duration of the morning handoff was 60 minutes (± 12.5) in ICU-1 and 35.2 minutes (± 10.6) in ICU-2 with a mean number of cases presented of 18.9 (± 1.3) and 9.3 (± 1.0) respectively. The mean (± SD) duration of a case was 175 seconds (± 108). Trauma stays, patients severity and comorbidities, and the number of organ supports were associated with longer case handoffs. Asjusting for these covariates, cases in the second half were shorter compared to cases in the first half (RR 0.65, 95%CI (0.51 - 0.80)).
conclusionsWe confirmed the existence of a portfolio effect within ICU handoffs, emphasizing that interventions targeting handoffs' improvement should focus on the content and the setting. We suggest avoiding the presentation of a same patient systematically at the end of the round.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.