ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Integrating structured and unstructured data for predicting emergency severity: an association and predictive study using transformer-based natural language processing models.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Model Automated Extraction of Clinical Signs and Symptoms From Emergency Department Reports for Machine Learning Prediction Models: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Prediction of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Machine Learning, Clinical Summary Notes, and Vital Signs: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in the United States.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- ICU mortality prediction via multimodal learning on MIMIC-IV clinical data.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- A Data-Driven Framework for Digital Transformation in Smart Cities: Integrating AI, Dashboards, and IoT Readiness.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sex differences in work-related accidents extracted from free text in Spanish using natural language processing.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Machine Learning for Personalized Prediction of Electrocardiogram (EKG) Use in Emergency Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Systematic Identification of Caregivers of Patients Living With Dementia in the Electronic Health Record: Known Contacts and Natural Language Processing Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Optimized BERT-based NLP outperforms zero-shot methods for automated symptom detection in clinical practice.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Feasibility of a multimodal AI-based clinical assessment platform in emergency care: an exploratory pilot study.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Leveraging reddit data for context-enhanced synthetic health data generation to identify low self esteem.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfficient triage in emergency departments (EDs) is critical for timely and appropriate care. Traditional triage systems primarily rely on structured data, but the increasing availability of unstructured data, such as clinical notes, presents an opportunity to enhance predictive models for assessing emergency severity and to explore associations between patient characteristics and severity outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining structured and unstructured data to predict emergency severity more accurately.
methodsData from the 2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) for adult ED patients were used. Emergency severity was categorized into urgent (scores 1-3) and non-urgent (scores 4-5) based on the Emergency Severity Index. Unstructured data, including chief complaints and reasons for visit, were processed using a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model. Structured data included patient demographics and clinical information. Four machine learning models-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting-were applied to three data configurations: structured data only, unstructured data only, and combined data. A mean probability model was also created by averaging the predicted probabilities from the structured and unstructured models.
resultsThe study included 8,716 adult patients, of whom 74.6% were classified as urgent. Association analysis revealed significant predictors of emergency severity, including older age (OR = 2.13 for patients 65 +), higher heart rate (OR = 1.56 for heart rates > 90 bpm), and specific chronic conditions such as chronic kidney disease (OR = 2.28) and coronary artery disease (OR = 2.55). Gradient Boosting with combined data demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.789, an accuracy of 0.726, and a precision of 0.892. The mean probability model also showed improvements over structured-only models.
conclusionsCombining structured and unstructured data improved the prediction of emergency severity in ED patients, highlighting the potential for enhanced triage systems. Integrating text data into predictive models can provide more accurate and nuanced severity assessments, improving resource allocation and patient outcomes. Further research should focus on real-time application and validation in diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.