Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633364›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Implementing an enhanced recovery from surgery pathway to reduce hospital length of stay for primary hip or knee arthroplasty: a budget impact analysis.

Melanie Lloyd, Zanfina Ademi, Ian A Harris, Justine Naylor, Peter Lewis, Richard de Steiger, Rachelle Buchbinder, Anthony Wan, Ilana N Ackerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melanie LloydCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, Australia.
Zanfina AdemiCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, Australia.
Ian A HarrisSchool of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Justine NaylorSchool of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Peter LewisAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Richard de SteigerDepartment of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Rachelle BuchbinderSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Anthony WanFANZCA, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ilana N AckermanSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. ilana.ackerman@monash.edu.

Funding

HCF Research Foundation Innovation Research GrantNational Health and Medical Research Council APP1194483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven growing demand for hip and knee arthroplasty and unsustainable resource requirements, safe and efficient models of care are critical. This study aims to determine the impact on healthcare costs of implementing an enhanced short-stay model of care (ESS-MOC) for arthroplasty at a national level.

methodsA budget impact analysis was conducted for the years 2023-2030 in the setting of Australian publicly and privately funded hospitals performing hip or knee arthroplasty. The model considered population-based future arthroplasty projections, published data on healthcare costs and resource utilisation, and aggregate health insurer claims data related to minor complexity elective hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. The ESS-MOC assigned a conservative hypothesized 30% of eligible patients to an enhanced recovery from surgery (ERAS) pathway which comprised a shortened acute ward stay (average 2 days versus 4 days with current care) and outpatient rehabilitation. The primary outcome was total healthcare cost savings post-ESS-MOC implementation, stratified by joint (knee/hip) and healthcare sector (public/private). Return on investment (ROI) ratio, measuring the return for each dollar invested in implementation, and hospital bed days utilized, were also estimated. Costs are presented in Australian dollars (AUD), at 2023 prices.

resultsEstimated cost savings for 2023-2030 from implementing the ESS-MOC pathway were AUD641 million (95% CI: AUD99 million to AUD1250 million), corresponding to a ROI ratio of AUD8.88 (AUD1.3 to AUD17.9). Total implementation costs for the ESS-MOC were estimated at AUD38 million and AUD34 million for the private and public sectors, respectively. Savings would be 8-fold higher in the private sector (AUD571 million vs. AUD70 million in the public sector), primarily attributable to the > 80,000 rehabilitation bed days saved annually in this sector. For the period 2023-2030, an estimated 337,000 (261,000 to 412,000) acute bed days could be saved (private sector 262,000 [200,000 to 324,000]; public sector 74,000 [57,000 to 92,000]). Less than 10% of eligible patients would need to move into the ERAS pathway to realise cost savings.

conclusionsImplementation of an enhanced short-stay model of care for eligible arthroplasty patients in Australia would generate significant cost and resource savings, particularly for the private hospital sector.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBudgetsLength of StayAustraliaCost SavingsEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFemaleHumansMaleArthroplastyBudget impact analysisEnhanced recovery after surgeryHealth service costs

Identifiers

PMID39633364
PMCPMC11616323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.