ArticleBMC oral health2024
Overdiagnosis of dental caries in South Korea: a pseudo-patient study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiographic artifacts in the diagnosis of dental caries: systematic review with meta-analysis.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Addressing low-value care (LVC) in Asia: a narrative review of Choosing Wisely and other initiatives across Asia.BMJ open quality · 2026Review
- Practice-Level Variation in the Provision of Subsidised Dental Services to Adult Danes in 2019: A Register-Based Study.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluates the tendency of South Korean dentists to over-diagnose clinically healthy teeth in pseudo-patients.
methodsWe conducted a pseudo-patient, cross-sectional study in 196 private dental clinics with 58 pseudo-patients in South Korea between August and December 2018. Trained pseudo-patients with no previous oral diseases, including dental caries, diagnosed by two experienced dentists, were sent to each dental clinic. Before visiting each private dental clinic, participants were instructed to state, "I have no symptoms, but I would like to have a dental caries examination". The oral examination was performed using visual and tactile inspection methods only. The interactions between the dental clinic staff and the pseudo-patient were documented on a data collection form shortly after each visit.
resultsIn 33.2% (65/196) of these interactions, the pseudo-patients were diagnosed as having no dental caries. 11.7% (23/196), 12.8% (25/196), 10.7% (21/196), and 10.7% (21/196) of the sample were diagnosed with dental caries in one, two, three, and four teeth, respectively. Dentists diagnosed five or more dental caries in 20.9% (41/196) of the sample. 196 dental clinics diagnosed a total of 503 dental caries. Of these, 392 were in molars. Small solo practice dentists diagnosed 3.54 dental caries and large group practice dentists 1.57, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.07). The recommendation rate for dental caries treatment was highest among 43 (55.1%) large solo practices, and lowest in 7 (33.3%) large group practices. However, small solo practices had the lowest rate of preventive care recommendations at 12 (30.8%) and 10 (47.6%) in large group practices. The data shows that preventive care recommendations increased as the practice size increased.
conclusionThe study findings indicate that Korean dentists tend to over-diagnose dental caries, which could pose a threat to public health both in Korea and worldwide. Therefore, it is important to carefully consider strategies to improve the correct diagnosis and standard of care for dental caries by private dentists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.