ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
The intraoperative localization in recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula after esophageal atresia repair: a comparative study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status of various types of ICG contrast imaging in pediatric thoracic surgery.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Congenital H-type tracheoesophageal fistula: Experience from a large Chinese center.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Left Cervical Approach for Unrecognized Proximal Tracheoesophageal Fistula in an Adolescent following Neonatal Esophageal Atresia Repair: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Thoracoscopic management of recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula: a single-center outcome analysis.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Insights into Tracheoesophageal Fistula Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (rTEF) is a rare complication following initial esophageal atresia (EA) surgical repair, posing challenges in localization the fistula during surgery due to severe thoracic adhesions and structural ambiguity from previous operations.
objectiveWe introduced two new localization methods for rTEF patients during surgery and aimed to compare the impact of using these localization techniques versus not using them on the surgical outcomes for rTEF patients.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of rTEF cases that underwent thoracoscopic repair at our hospital from September 2017 to December 2024. Patients were divided into localization group and non-localization group based on whether using intraoperative localization techniques, and comparative analysis of clinical variables was conducted between groups.
resultsA total of 106 patients were included in this study, undergoing a total of 113 thoracoscopic rTEF repair surgeries at our center. Their fistula type included 89 cases of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), 19 cases of esophageal-pulmonary fistula (EPF), 3 cases of esophageal bronchial fistula (EBF), and 2 cases of combined EPF and TEF. All cases were categorized based on whether using localization techniques, resulting in the localization group (n = 52) and the non-localization group (n = 61). The median operation time in the localization group (2.5 h) was significantly lower than in the latter (3.0 h) (P = 0.001), and regardless of the fistula type being TEF or EPF. Additionally, the average postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the localization group (17.7 ± 7.5 days) than in the non-localization group (23.6 ± 20.0 days) regarding the fistula type of TEF (P = 0.03).
conclusionsThe use of localization techniques in thoracoscopic surgery for rTEF leads to better outcomes, evidenced by reduced operation time and hospital stay, suggesting enhanced surgical accuracy and improved patient postoperative recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LEVEL III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.