Observational studyBMC health services research2024
Incorporating clinical and demographic data into the Elixhauser Comorbidity Model: deriving and validating an enhanced model in a tertiary hospital's internal medicine department.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Retrospective Sepsis Classification Based on Elixhauser Comorbidity Groups Using Machine and Deep Learning on MIMIC-IV.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Promise of Electronic Health Records to Inform Triage Decisions in Pneumonia.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Improving Discrimination in Predicting Level of Care Needed for Patients Admitted with Pneumonia.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe Elixhauser Comorbidity Model is a prominent, freely-available risk adjustment model which performs well in predicting outcomes of inpatient care. However, because it relies solely on diagnosis codes, it may not capture the full extent of patient complexity. Our objective was to enhance and validatethe Elixhauser Model by incorporating additional clinical and demographic data to improve the accuracy of outcome prediction.
methodsThis retrospective observational cohort study included 55,945 admissions to the internal medicine service of a large tertiary care hospital in Jerusalem. A model was derived and validated to predict four primary outcomes. The four primary outcomes measured were length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, readmission within 30 days, and increased care.
resultsInitially, the Elixhauser Model was applied using standard Elixhauser definitions based on diagnosis codes. Subsequently, clinical variables such as laboratory test results, vital signs, and demographic information were added to the model. The expanded models demonstrated improved prediction compared to the baseline model. For example, the R
conclusionsAdding readily available clinical and demographic data to the base Elixhauser model improves outcome prediction by a considerable margin. This enhanced model provides a more comprehensive representation of patients' health status. It could be utilized to support decisions regarding admission and to what setting, determine suitability for home hospitalization, and facilitate differential payment adjustments based on patient complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.