ArticleBMC health services research2024
Healthcare providers' and community stakeholders' perception of using drones for tuberculosis diagnosis in Nepal: an exploratory qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the acceptance of drone delivery services among Chinese consumers: A perspective from urban and rural areas.PloS one · 2025Article
- Unmanned aerial vehicle payload technology applications in agriculture and other low-altitude scenarios: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Healthcare professionals' readiness and perceived barriers to drone-assisted emergency healthcare in Palestine.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn rural Nepal, poor road and transport networks and few testing laboratories impede tuberculosis diagnosis. A drone transport system was established to transport sputum samples to laboratories with advanced molecular diagnostic machines - GeneXpert MTB/RIF. This study explored the perceptions of using drones for tuberculosis diagnosis among community stakeholders, female community health volunteers, and healthcare providers from communities with drones implemented and without drone programs.
methodsIn December 2019, we conducted focus group discussions in two drone-implemented and three without drone programs. We purposively selected 40 participants: Female community health volunteers (n=16), community stakeholders (n=18), and healthcare providers (n=6). Focus group discussions employed semi-structured questions, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Codebook thematic analysis was performed and charted using three levels of the socioecological model: individual, community, and health system.
resultsWe identified four themes (i) Trust in drones underpins successful use for tuberculosis diagnosis; (ii) Drone-based sample transport optimised connectivity and accessibility for people with tuberculosis and healthcare providers; (iii) Drones create opportunities to improve community and health system, and (iv) External factors impede the use of drones to facilitate tuberculosis diagnosis. The study reported, at an individual level, people's trust in drones mainly through community-based events. For local healthcare providers, drones reduce transport time, opportunity costs, and immediate cash costs of transport. At the community level, drone use creates opportunities to increase the skills of local people as drone pilots. At the health system level, drone transport increases efficient sputum sample delivery and provides opportunities to transport medicines and other biomedical samples. Perceived challenges of using drones were adverse weather, limitations in skilled human resources, and financial resources to operate drones sustainably.
conclusionsHealthcare providers, female community health volunteers, and community stakeholders reported high levels of trust in drones and perceived their use for tuberculosis diagnosis and care to substantially benefit people with tuberculosis and providers in rural Nepal. There was a high level of demand for application to other healthcare services and wider geographical coverage, demonstrating drones as a potential tool for enhancing access to healthcare in geographically remote communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.