Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633282›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Interpretable Machine Learning Approach for Predicting 30-Day Mortality of Critical Ill Patients with Pulmonary Embolism and Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study.

Jing Liu, Ruobei Li, Tiezhu Yao, Guang Liu, Ling Guo, Jing He, Zhengkun Guan, Shaoyan Du, Jingtao Ma, Zhenli Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Atorvastatin versus rosuvastatin in acute myocardial infarction with elevated liver enzymes: a target trial emulation study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jing LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Provence, People's Republic of China.
Ruobei LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Tiezhu YaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Provence, People's Republic of China.
Guang LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Provence, People's Republic of China.
Ling GuoDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Provence, People's Republic of China.
Jing HeDepartment of Cardiology, Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhengkun GuanDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Provence, People's Republic of China.
Shaoyan DuDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Provence, People's Republic of China.
Jingtao MaDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Provence, People's Republic of China.
Zhenli LiDepartment of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Provence, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary embolism (PE) patients combined with heart failure (HF) have been reported to have a high short-term mortality. However, few studies have developed predictive tools of 30-day mortality for these patients in intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to construct and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict 30-day mortality for PE patients combined with HF in ICU.

methodsWe enrolled patients with PE combined with HF in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Database (MIMIC) and developed six ML models after feature selection. Further, eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) was utilized for external vali- dation. The area under curves (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were performed to evaluate the prediction performance. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) was performed to enhance the interpretability of our models.

resultsA total of 472 PE patients combined with HF were included. We developed six ML models by the 13 selected features. After internal validation, the Support Vector Ma- chine (SVM) model performed best with an AUC of 0.835, a superior calibration degree, and a wider risk threshold (from 0% to 90%) for obtaining clinical benefit, which also outperformed traditional mortality risk evaluation systems,as evaluated by NRI and IDI. The SVM model was still reliable after external validation. SHAP was performed to explain the model. Moreover, an online application was developed for further clinical use.

conclusionThis study developed a potential tool for identify short-term mortality risk to guide clinical decision making for PE patients combined with HF in the ICU. The SHAP method also helped clinicians to better understand the model.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHeart FailureMachine LearningPulmonary EmbolismAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesheart failureintensive care unitmachine learningmortalityprediction modelpulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID39633282
PMCPMC11618897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.