Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633267›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Transforming community-based primary health care delivery through comprehensive performance measurement and reporting: examining the influence of context.

Sabrina T Wong, Manpreet Thandi, Ruth Martin-Misener, Sharon Johnston, William Hogg, Fred Burge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabrina T WongSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, T201 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada. sabrina.wong@ubc.ca.
Manpreet ThandiSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, T201 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Ruth Martin-MisenerSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Avenue, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Sharon JohnstonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, 201-699 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
William HoggDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, 201-699 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
Fred BurgeDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5909 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Abbie J Lane Building, Halifax, NS, B3H 2E2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based primary health care represents various community-based health care (CBPHC) models that incorporate health promotion and community development to deliver first-contact health services. Learning health systems (LHSs) are essential for improving CBPHC in which feedback from relevant stakeholders is used to continuously improve health systems with the goal of achieving population health and health equity. Performance reporting is one way to present data to clinicians and decision makers to facilitate a process of reflection, participation, and collaboration among partners to improve CBPHC.

methodsOur objective was to obtain feedback on a regional CBPHC performance portrait through key informant interviews. We used purposive convenience sampling to recruit participants who were clinicians in primary care and/or decision-makers in primary care at a regional level. The performance portrait summarized results of survey questions asked of patients, providers, and primary care organizations. The portrait was organized by the 10 pillars of the Patient's Medical Home (PMH) model. Interview questions specifically asked about portrait content, formatting, interpretability, utility, and dissemination strategies. Content analysis was used to analyze interview data.

resultsWe completed 19 interviews with key informants from the Canadian provinces of Nova Scotia (n = 8), Ontario (n = 6) and British Columbia (n = 5). We coded transcripts into four content areas: (1) Usability as influenced by content and interpretability, (2) Formatting, (3) Utility, and (4) Dissemination. Using data and reporting back to clinicians and decision-makers about how their practices and jurisdictions are performing in primary care in meaningful ways is important. Our results suggest having available methodology notes, including the analysis used to develop any scoring, sampling and sample sizes, and interpretation of the statistics is necessary.

conclusionsThis research was the first to create a comprehensive performance portrait using data driven by factors that are important to primary care partners. We obtained important feedback on the portrait in the context of usability, formatting, utility, and dissemination. This data needs to be used to provide feedback in continuous cycles to evaluate and improve CBPHC models as part of a LHS.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesPrimary Health CareBritish ColumbiaCanadaHumansLearning Health SystemNova ScotiaOntarioPatient-Centered CareCommunity based primary health careLearning health systemsPerformance reportingPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID39633267
PMCPMC11616284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.