ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Interventional treatment of non-spontaneously healed spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case report.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a significant cause of non-atherosclerotic acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. Women account for 87-95% of SCAD patients, with the average age of onset ranging from 44 to 53 years. Approximately 95% of cases reported to resolve spontaneously. However, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can lead to various complications, prompting guidelines to recommend conservative management for patients categorized as low-risk. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old woman presented with intermittent dyspnea lasting three months. Initial coronary angiography revealed severe stenosis of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) demonstrated dissection, hematoma, and thrombus in the proximal LAD. Following balloon dilation, the hematoma extended distally, resulting in no-reflow, which subsequently led to thrombosis in the left main coronary artery. A stent was deployed from the mid to proximal LAD, leading to gradual improvement in blood flow, achieving TIMI grade 3. Two months post-discharge, the patient was readmitted. Coronary angiography showed patent stents, with no significant stenosis in the previously placed stent, but a new stent was inserted in the distal segment of the LAD. Eight months later, repeat angiography revealed patent stents and no notable abnormalities in the remaining vessels.
conclusionFor high-risk SCAD patients who do not exhibit spontaneous healing, vascular revascularization should be considered judiciously. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.