ArticleBMC plant biology2024
Characterization of tae-miR156(s) and their response to abiotic stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- miR156-StSPL9 regulating the biosynthesis of flavonoids and secondary metabolites in potato tubers.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Contrasting roles of VfSBP transcription factors in regulating disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in faba bean.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- MicroRNAs-mediated heat stress regulations in plants: Mechanisms and targets.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Characterization of the Glutamine Synthetase Gene Family in Wheat (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microRNA156 (miR156) has been widely studied in plants, however, the characterization of the miR156 family of genes in wheat and their expression patterns under abiotic stress are not completely clear. In this study, a total of 20 miR156 family members, referred to as tae-miR156a to tae-miR156t, were identified in wheat with their loci mapped to various chromosomes. These members were divided into five subgroups: miR156a/b/c/d/e/f, miR156g/h/i, miR156j/k, miR156l/m/n/o/p/q, and miR156r/s/t. They were highly conserved during evolution. The prediction of cis-elements in the tae-MIR156(s) promoter region revealed that the tae-MIR156(s) had diverse cis-acting elements; of these, 15 tae-MIR156(s) and 6 tae-MIR156(s) were found to be drought-responsive elements and cold-responsive elements, respectively. And the prediction target genes of tae-miR156(s) are mainly SPL transcription factor genes. Expression analysis based on quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‒PCR) showed that miR156(s) have different expression levels in the various wheat tissues, and the subgroups' response to abiotic stress varied. Among them, miR156g/h/i were strongly induced in the root of cold and heat stress, and miR156a/b/c/d/e/f were significantly increased in roots after drought stress, whereas miR156r/s/t were highly inhibited in leaves and roots after salt stress. These findings imply that tae-miR156(s) are involved in stress response in wheat, and they provide new fundamental knowledge for further analysis of the function of miR156 and its regulatory mechanism in response to abiotic stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.