Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633245›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2025

Supercritical CO

Lakshmi Shiva Shankar, Derek Ovc-Okene, Edit Székely, Márton Kőrösi, Robert Kun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Supercritical COChemSusChem · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lakshmi Shiva ShankarInstitute of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar tudósok krt. 2., Budapest, H-1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-4387
Derek Ovc-OkeneInstitute of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar tudósok krt. 2., Budapest, H-1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3774-2381
Edit SzékelyDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Process Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3, Budapest, H-1111, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6935-0071
Márton KőrösiDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Process Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3, Budapest, H-1111, Hungary.
Robert KunInstitute of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar tudósok krt. 2., Budapest, H-1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5082-3422

Funding

National Research, Development, and Innovation Office of HungaryRecovery and Resilience Facility of the European Union PD_23 146145Recovery and Resilience Facility of the European Union RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional Li-S battery cathode synthesis routes are time-consuming, energy-intensive, use toxic solvents, and yet fail to effectively confine sulfur into carbon matrices, reducing the cathode efficiency. Supercritical CO₂ (scCO

Indexed as

Carbon-sulfur composite engineeringGreen solvent technologyLi−S batterySupercritical CO2Supercritical fluids

Identifiers

PMID39633245
PMCPMC11997936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.