Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633213›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image-Quality Improvement Using "One-Shot" Super-resolution.

Takumasa Tsuji, Soichiro Yoshida, Mitsuki Hommyo, Asuka Oyama, Shinobu Kumagai, Kenshiro Shiraishi, Jun'ichi Kotoku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takumasa TsujiGraduate School of Medical Care and Technology, Teikyo University, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan.
Soichiro YoshidaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Mitsuki HommyoGraduate School of Medical Care and Technology, Teikyo University, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan.
Asuka OyamaHealth Care Division, Health and Counseling Center, Osaka University, 1 Machikaneyamatyo, Toyonaka-Shi, Osaka, 560-0043, Japan.
Shinobu KumagaiCentral of Radiology, Teikyo University Hospital, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.
Kenshiro ShiraishiDepartment of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan.
Jun'ichi KotokuGraduate School of Medical Care and Technology, Teikyo University, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan. kotoku@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-6003

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJER2102Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H05108Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K10918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are convenient representations for obtaining information about patients' internal organs, but their lower image quality than those of treatment planning CT images constitutes an important shortcoming. Several proposed CBCT image-quality improvement methods based on deep learning require large amounts of training data. Our newly developed model using a super-resolution method, "one-shot" super-resolution (OSSR) based on the "zero-shot" super-resolution method, requires only small amounts of training data to improve CBCT image quality using only the target CBCT image and the paired treatment planning CT image. For this study, pelvic CBCT images and treatment planning CT images of 30 prostate cancer patients were used. We calculated the root mean squared error (RMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity (SSIM) to evaluate image-quality improvement and normalized mutual information (NMI) as a quantitative evaluation of positional accuracy. Our proposed method can improve CBCT image quality without requiring large amounts of training data. After applying our proposed method, the resulting RMSE, PSNR, SSIM, and NMI between the CBCT images and the treatment planning CT images were as much as 0.86, 1.05, 1.03, and 1.31 times better than those obtained without using our proposed method. By comparison, CycleGAN exhibited values of 0.91, 1.03, 1.02, and 1.16. The proposed method achieved performance equivalent to that of CycleGAN, which requires images from approximately 30 patients for training. Findings demonstrated improvement of CBCT image quality using only the target CBCT images and the paired treatment planning CT images.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProstatic NeoplasmsQuality ImprovementDeep LearningHumansMaleRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioCone beam CTDeep learningDeformable image registrationOne-shot learningSuper-resolution

Identifiers

PMID39633213
PMCPMC12344046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.