ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image-Quality Improvement Using "One-Shot" Super-resolution.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A high-precision hierarchical registration approach for stain- and scanner-independent colocalization on whole slide images in histopathology.Health information science and systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are convenient representations for obtaining information about patients' internal organs, but their lower image quality than those of treatment planning CT images constitutes an important shortcoming. Several proposed CBCT image-quality improvement methods based on deep learning require large amounts of training data. Our newly developed model using a super-resolution method, "one-shot" super-resolution (OSSR) based on the "zero-shot" super-resolution method, requires only small amounts of training data to improve CBCT image quality using only the target CBCT image and the paired treatment planning CT image. For this study, pelvic CBCT images and treatment planning CT images of 30 prostate cancer patients were used. We calculated the root mean squared error (RMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity (SSIM) to evaluate image-quality improvement and normalized mutual information (NMI) as a quantitative evaluation of positional accuracy. Our proposed method can improve CBCT image quality without requiring large amounts of training data. After applying our proposed method, the resulting RMSE, PSNR, SSIM, and NMI between the CBCT images and the treatment planning CT images were as much as 0.86, 1.05, 1.03, and 1.31 times better than those obtained without using our proposed method. By comparison, CycleGAN exhibited values of 0.91, 1.03, 1.02, and 1.16. The proposed method achieved performance equivalent to that of CycleGAN, which requires images from approximately 30 patients for training. Findings demonstrated improvement of CBCT image quality using only the target CBCT images and the paired treatment planning CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.