Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633212›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Machine Learning Based on Digital Mammography to Reduce the Need for Invasive Biopsies of Benign Calcifications Classified in BI-RADS Category 4.

Neng Wang, Wenjie Xu, Huogen Wang, Sikai Wu, Jian Wang, Weiqun Ao, Cui Zhang, Yun Zhu, Zongyu Xie, Guoqun Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Neng WangThe Second Clinical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenjie XuDepartment of Radiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234, Gucui RoadZhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310012, China.
Huogen WangHithink RoyalFlush Information Network Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Sikai WuThe Second Clinical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Radiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234, Gucui RoadZhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310012, China.
Weiqun AoDepartment of Radiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234, Gucui RoadZhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310012, China.
Cui ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234, Gucui RoadZhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310012, China.
Yun ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Zongyu XieDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Guoqun MaoDepartment of Radiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No. 234, Gucui RoadZhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310012, China. maoguoqun123@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop a machine learning model applied on digital mammograms to reduce unnecessary invasive biopsies for suspicious calcifications classified as BI-RADS category 4. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 372 female patients with pathologically confirmed BI-RADS category 4 mammographic calcifications. Patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (n = 275) were divided chronologically into a training and internal validation set. An external validation set (n = 97) was recruited from Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province. We first segmented calcifications using nnUnet, and then built a radiomics model and deep learning model, respectively. Finally, we used an information fusion method to combine the results of the two models to obtain the final prediction. The different models, including the radiomics model, the deep learning model, and the fusion model, were evaluated on the validation set from two hospitals. In the external validation set, the radiomics model yielded an AUC of 0.883 (95% CI, 0.802-0.939), a sensitivity of 0.921, and a specificity of 0.735, and the deep learning model yielded an AUC of 0.873 (95% CI, 0.789-0.932), a sensitivity of 0.905, and a specificity of 0.853. The fusion model achieved an AUC of 0.947 (95% CI, 0.882-0.982), sensitivity of 0.825, and specificity of 0.941 in the external validation set. The fusion model has the potential to reduce the need for invasive biopsies of benign mammographic calcifications classified as BI-RADS category 4, without sacrificing the diagnostic accuracy for malignant cases.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCalcinosisMachine LearningMammographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedBiopsyDeep LearningFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBreast cancerCalcificationDeep learningDigital mammographyRadiomics model

Identifiers

PMID39633212
PMCPMC12344057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.