Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633151›Full record

ReviewNature biotechnology2024

Biology and applications of CRISPR-Cas12 and transposon-associated homologs.

Wen Y Wu, Belén Adiego-Pérez, John van der Oost

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Identification of candidate nucleomodulins in ESKAPE bacteria -Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wen Y Wu *Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. w.y.wu@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-7293
Belén Adiego-Pérez *Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
John van der OostLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. john.vanderoost@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5024-1871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-associated Cas12 proteins are a highly variable collection of nucleic acid-targeting proteins. All Cas12 variants use RNA guides and a single nuclease domain to target complementary DNA or, in rare cases, RNA. The high variability of Cas12 effectors can be explained by a series of independent evolution events from different transposon-associated TnpB-like ancestors. Despite basic structural and functional similarities, this has resulted in unprecedented variation of the Cas12 effector proteins in terms of size, domain composition, guide structure, target identity and interference strategy. In this Review, we compare the unique molecular features of natural and engineered Cas12 and TnpB variants. Furthermore, we provide an overview of established genome editing and diagnostic applications and discuss potential future directions.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Transposable ElementsGene EditingCRISPR-Associated ProteinsHumansCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.