Trial reportInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Real-time intraoperative ultrasound registration for accurate surgical navigation in patients with pelvic malignancies.
Trial report in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05637346 (Intra-operative Vessel and Bone Acquisition, Towards Ultrasound Registration for Surgical Navigation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intra-operative Vessel and Bone Acquisition, Towards Ultrasound Registration for Surgical Navigation
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electromagnetic Surgical Navigation for Accurate Pediatric Tumor Localization: A Preclinical Animal Cadaver Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Precise and minimally invasive localization of pelvic nodes during robot-assisted surgery using image-guided navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Real-time surgical navigation for intraoperative lymph node localization during targeted robot-assisted pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Performance of a tracked ultrasound navigation setup for pediatric tumor surgery: a phantom study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant chemo-reirradiation followed by resection and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy: outcomes of multimodality treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of UNeXt for Automatic Bone Surface Segmentation on Ultrasound Imaging in Image-Guided Pediatric Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSurgical navigation aids surgeons in localizing and adequately resecting pelvic malignancies. Accuracy of the navigation system highly depends on the preceding registration procedure, which is generally performed using intraoperative fluoroscopy or CT. However, these ionizing methods are time-consuming and peroperative updates of the registration are cumbersome. In this present clinical study, several real-time intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) registration methods have been developed and evaluated for accuracy.
methodsDuring laparotomy in prospectively included patients, sterile electromagnetically tracked iUS acquisitions of the pelvic vessels and bones were collected. An initial registration and five other rigid iUS registration methods were developed including real-time deep learning bone and artery segmentation of 2D ultrasound. For each registration method, the accuracy was computed as the target registration error (TRE) using pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) as targets.
resultsThirty patients were included. The mean ± SD ultrasound acquisition time was 4.2 ± 1.4 min for the pelvic bone and 4.0 ± 1.1 min for the arteries. Deep learning bone and artery ultrasound segmentation resulted in an average (centerline)Dice of 0.85 and a mean surface distance below 2 mm. In 21 patients with visible LNs, initial registration resulted in a median (interquartile range [IQR]) TRE of 7.4 (5.9-10.9) mm. For the other five methods, 2D and 3D bone registration resulted in significantly lower TREs than 2D artery, 3D artery and bifurcation registration (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test p < 0.01). The real-time 2D bone registration method was most accurate with a median (IQR) TRE of 2.6 (1.3-5.7) mm.
conclusionReal-time 2D iUS bone registration is a fast and accurate method for patient registration prior to surgical navigation and has advantages over current registration techniques. Because of the user dependency of iUS, intuitive software is crucial for optimal clinical implementation. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT05637346).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39633142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.