ArticleMicrobial ecology2024
Phylosymbiosis in Seven Wild Fish Species Collected Off the Southern Coast of Korea: Skin Microbiome Most Strongly Reflects Evolutionary Pressures.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From onset to healing: temporal dynamics of microbial communities pinpoint Midichloria-like organism's key role in the development of the fish skin disease red mark syndrome.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Scents and Scent Ability: Can Snakes Identify Heterospecifics and Conspecifics Using Airborne Semiochemicals?Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Article
- Host matters: coral reef fish species show distinct skin microbiome responses to upwelling-driven environmental changes.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbiome characterization of the sea slugs Elysia viridis and Placida dendritica: insights into potential roles in kleptoplasty.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Ephemeral signatures of phylosymbiosis in dermal microbiomes within the requiem shark family (Carcharhinidae).Access microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phylosymbiosis is defined as the relationship in which the microbiome recapitulates the phylogeny of the host and has been demonstrated in a variety of terrestrial organisms, although it has been understudied in fish, the most phylogenetically diverse vertebrate. Given that the species-specificity of fish microbiomes was detected in multiple body parts and differed by body parts, we assumed that the phylogenetic reflection of the microbiome would differ across body parts. Thus, we analyze the difference of phylosymbiotic relationships in the microbial communities found in three body parts (skin, gills, and intestine) of seven wild fish species from four families (Labridae, Sebastidae, Sparidae, and Rajidae) via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Fishes were purchased at Docheon port market in Tongyeong City, Korea and were transported to nearby research institutes for aliveness. Mantel tests using dissimilarity values of microbiomes and hosts' divergence times showed that the differences in microbial communities in all three body parts were related to the hosts' divergence time. This pattern was the most pronounced in the skin. Furthermore, fishes from the same family showed similar bacterial compositions on their skins and gills, with clear differences depending on the family, with the exception of Labridae. These results suggest that the skin microbiome is particularly vulnerable to evolutionary pressures. We hypothesized that the evolution of the fish immune system and the difference in feeding habits induced the stronger phylosymbiotic signal in the skin. Collectively, this dataset will be useful for understanding the fish microbiome and give insights into phylosymbiosis of aquatic animals across body parts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.