ArticleScientific reports2024
Clustering explanation based on multi-hyperrectangle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clustering plays a crucial role in data mining and pattern recognition, but the interpretation of clustering results is often challenging. Existing interpretation methods usually lack an intuitive and accurate description of irregular shapes and high dimensional datas. This paper proposes a novel clustering explanation method based on a Multi-HyperRectangle(MHR), for extracting post hoc explanations of clustering results. MHR first generates initial hyperrectangles to cover each cluster, and then these hyper-rectangles are gradually merged until the optimal shape is obtained to fit the cluster. The advantage of this method is that it recognizes the shape of irregular clusters and finds the optimal number of hyper-rectangles based on the hierarchical tree structure, which discovers structural relationships between rectangles. Furthermore, we propose a refinement method to improve the tightness of the hyperrectangles, resulting in more precise and comprehensible explanations. Experimental results demonstrate that MHR significantly outperforms existing methods in both the tightness and accuracy of cluster interpretation, highlighting its effectiveness and innovation in addressing the challenges of clustering interpretation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.