Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39633083›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

Continuous motion tracking for accurate and efficient color vision assessment.

Chenxi Liang, Jing Chen, Zhongting Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chenxi LiangSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Jing ChenSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China. chenjingps@gmail.com.
Zhongting ChenAffiliated Mental Health Center (ECNU), School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. ztchen@psy.ecnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2209-7248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of color vision is crucial in both fundamental visual research and clinical diagnosis. However, existing tools for color vision assessment are limited by various factors. This study introduces a novel, efficient method for color vision assessment, which is based on a continuous motion tracking task and a Kalman filter model. The effectiveness of this new method was evaluated by assessing the color vision of both color-deficient observers and normal controls. The results from both a small sample (N = 29, Experiment 1) and a large sample (N = 171, Experiment 2) showed that color-deficient observers could be perfectly identified within 20 s using the tracking performance. We also compared the new method with a traditional psychophysical detection task to examine the consistency of perceptual noise estimation between the two methods, and the results showed a moderate correlation (Pearson's r = .59 ~ .64). The results also demonstrated that the new method could measure individuals' contrast response functions of both red-green and blue-yellow colors (e.g., the L-M and S-(L + M) axes in DKL color space) in just a few minutes, showing much higher efficiency than traditional methods. All the findings from this study indicate that the continuous motion tracking method is a promising tool for both rapid screening of color vision deficiencies and fundamental research on color vision.

Indexed as

Color Vision DefectsAdolescentAdultColor PerceptionColor Perception TestsColor VisionFemaleHumansMaleMotion PerceptionYoung AdultColor visionContinuous psychophysicsKalman filterMotion tracking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.