ArticleScientific reports2024
Development and validation of CNN-MLP models for predicting anti-VEGF therapy outcomes in diabetic macular edema.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Health care science · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A machine learning model for predicting anatomical response to Anti-VEGF therapy in diabetic macular edema.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: advancing diagnosis, precision surgery, and anti-VEGF therapy optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes that can lead to vision loss, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for DME, but the treatment outcomes vary widely among patients. This study collected optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and clinical data from DME patients who received anti-VEGF treatment to develop and validate deep learning (DL) models for predicting the anti-VEGF outcomes in DME patients based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) combined architecture by using multimodal data. An Xception-MLP architecture was utilized to predict best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), cube volume (CV), and cube average thickness (CAT). Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE) and mean squared logarithmic error (MSLE) were employed to evaluate the model performance. In this study, both the training set and the validation set exhibited a consistent decreasing trend in MAE, MSE, and MSLE. No statistical difference was found between the actual and predicted values in all clinical indicators. This study demonstrated that the improved CNN-MLP regression models using multimodal data can accurately predict outcomes in BCVA, CST, CV, and CAT after anti-VEGF therapy in DME patients, which is valuable for ophthalmic clinical decisions and reduces the economic burden on patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.