ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024
Leveraging natural language processing to aggregate field safety notices of medical devices across the EU.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Evidence and FDA Recalls of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of field safety notices concerning implantable pacemakers and defibrillators.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing and Not Replacing Clinical Expertise: Improving Named-Entity Recognition in Colonoscopy Reports Through Mixed Real-Synthetic Training Sources.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Frequency of safety signals from scientific reports, manufactures, registers, and other sources for a random selection of hip and knee prostheses.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The European Union (EU) Medical Device Regulation and In Vitro Medical Device Regulation have introduced more rigorous regulatory requirements for medical devices, including new rules for post-market surveillance. However, EU market vigilance is limited by the absence of harmonized reporting systems, languages and nomenclatures among Member States. Our aim was to develop a framework based on Natural Language Processing capable of automatically collecting publicly available Field Safety Notices (FSNs) reporting medical device problems by applying web scraping to EU authority websites, to attribute the most suitable device category based on the European Medical Device Nomenclature (EMDN), and to display processed FSNs in an aggregated way to allow multiple queries. 65,036 FSNs published up to 31/12/2023 were retrieved from 16 EU countries, of which 40,212 (61.83%) were successfully assigned the proper EMDN. The framework's performance was successfully tested, with accuracies ranging from 87.34% to 98.71% for EMDN level 1 and from 64.15% to 85.71% even for level 4.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.