ArticleScientific reports2024
Hydrophobicity of periodic structure with taper angle under pressure impact.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomimetic periodic structures have garnered attention due to their excellent water repellency. The normal-taper angle, which is aspects of the cross-sectional structure, is important factor in achieving water repellency and pressure resistance; however, the underlying physical phenomenon has not been fully explained. Moreover, once a surface becomes hydrophobic, it is difficult to measure the apparent contact angle. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the taper angle that provides high water repellency under pressure impact conditions by formulating the relationship between the taper angle and the height of a droplet bouncing, instead of traditional contact angles, using experimental results. We fabricated multiple samples with different taper angles and groove width/tooth width ratios, through micro-processing using a femtosecond-pulsed laser and a control algorithm, and investigated their effects on water repellency. By using height of a droplet bouncing as an evaluation parameter, we were able to effectively differentiate between taper angles in terms of water repellency. Additionally, we suggested that in the bouncing phenomenon, where droplets are given velocity by falling, the sidewall of the periodic structure and the taper angle affect liquid repellency. To explain this phenomenon, we proposed a pressured-taper angle model where a droplet is pressed against the taper angle. Based on both experimental findings and the pressured-taper angle model, a relationship between the equilibrium contact angle, the taper angle, and the lifting force angle was revealed. Moreover, using this pressured-taper angle model, the taper angle of the periodic structure to achieve maximum liquid repellency was estimated from the equilibrium contact angle of the base material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.