ArticleScientific reports2024
Temporal integration on the dendrites of fast-spiking basket cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurons receive synaptic inputs with diverse temporal patterns in vivo, and their integration of these patterns is critical for understanding information processing mechanisms in the brain. Fast-spiking basket cells, which perform both supralinear and sublinear dendritic integration, are essential for inhibitory control in the hippocampus. However, their responses and the mechanisms underlying different temporal input patterns remain unclear. To address this question, we apply inputs with varying windows of time to a detailed compartmental model of basket cells. Our results reveal that when synaptic inputs are randomly dispersed, temporal integration in FS BCs exhibits a sigmoid-like response within the temporal window. In contrast, synchronous input protocols more effectively elicit action potentials, while asynchronous inputs generate more spikes in response to suprathreshold stimuli. Further analysis shows that the supralinear dendrites of fast-spiking basket cells primarily mediate this nonlinearity to asynchronous inputs, owing to their larger dendritic diameters. Moreover, we discover that delayed rectifier [Formula: see text] channels reduce sensitivity to synchronous inputs, whereas N-type [Formula: see text] channels enhance sensitivity to asynchronous inputs. These results provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the temporal coding of fast-spiking basket cells, which is crucial for understanding their role in neuronal oscillations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.