ArticleScientific reports2024
Developing a nearly automated open-source pipeline for conducting computational fluid dynamics simulations in anterior brain vasculature: a feasibility study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of pulmonary hypertension with pulmonary vascular surface volume ratio by non-contrast CT.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- A Joint Geometric Topological Analysis Network (JGTA-Net) for Detecting and Segmenting Intracranial Aneurysms.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- The Robust Vessel Segmentation and Centerline Extraction: One-Stage Deep Learning Approach.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms (IA) pose significant health risks and are often challenging to manage. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation has emerged as a powerful tool for understanding lesion-specific hemodynamics in and around IAs, aiding in the clinical management of patients with an IA. However, the current workflow of CFD simulations is time-consuming, complex, and labor-intensive and, thus, does not fit the clinical environment. To address these challenges, we have developed a semi-automated pipeline integrating multiple open-source software packages to streamline the CFD simulation process. Specifically, the study utilized medical angiography data from 18 patients. An in-house open-source DL image segmentation model (ARU-Net) was employed to generate 3D computer models of the anterior circulation. The segmented intracranial vasculature models, including IAs, were further refined using the Vascular Modeling Toolkit (VMTK), an open-source Python package. This step involved smoothing the surface of the models and extending the inlet and outlet regions to ensure a realistic representation of the vascular geometry. The refined vascular models were then converted into computational meshes using an open-source mesh generator known as TetGen. This process was nearly automated and required minimal user interaction(s). Blood flow simulations of the cerebral vascular models were performed using established SimVascular solvers (an open-source finite element platform for vascular applications) through an application programming interface (API). The CFD simulation process was also conducted using the manual workflow for comparative purposes. The initial assessment compared the geometries derived from manual and DL-based segmentation. The DL-based segmentation demonstrated reliable performance, closely aligning with manually segmented results, evidenced by excellent Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) values and low relative difference (RD) values ranging from 3% to 10% between the computed geometrical variables derived from both methods. The statistical analysis of the computed hemodynamic variables, including velocity informatics and WSS-related variables, indicated good to excellent reliability for most parameters (e.g., ICC of 0.85-0.95). Given the data investigated, the proposed automated workflow streamlines the process of conducting CFD simulations. It generates results consistent with the current standard manual CFD protocol while minimizing dependence on user input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.