ArticleScientific reports2024
Eeg based smart emotion recognition using meta heuristic optimization and hybrid deep learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Review of Deep Learning Techniques for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: Models, Methods, and Datasets.F1000Research · 2025Pooled it
- Lightweight deep learning model for nonconvulsive status epilepticus diagnosis using EEG time-frequency analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Iterative multiblock framework for high frequency EEG based neurological disorder detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the domain of passive brain-computer interface applications, the identification of emotions is both essential and formidable. Significant research has recently been undertaken on emotion identification with electroencephalogram (EEG) data. The aim of this project is to develop a system that can analyse an individual's EEG and differentiate among positive, neutral, and negative emotional states. The suggested methodology use Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to remove artefacts from Electromyogram (EMG) and Electrooculogram (EOG) in EEG channel recordings. Filtering techniques are employed to improve the quality of EEG data by segmenting it into alpha, beta, gamma, and theta frequency bands. Feature extraction is performed with a hybrid meta-heuristic optimisation technique, such as ABC-GWO. The Hybrid Artificial Bee Colony and Grey Wolf Optimiser are employed to extract optimised features from the selected dataset. Finally, comprehensive evaluations are conducted utilising DEAP and SEED, two publically accessible datasets. The CNN model attains an accuracy of approximately 97% on the SEED dataset and 98% on the DEAP dataset. The hybrid CNN-ABC-GWO model achieves an accuracy of approximately 99% on both datasets, with ABC-GWO employed for hyperparameter tuning and classification. The proposed model demonstrates an accuracy of around 99% on the SEED dataset and 100% on the DEAP dataset. The experimental findings are contrasted utilising a singular technique, a widely employed hybrid learning method, or the cutting-edge method; the proposed method enhances recognition performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.