Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632911›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Dual gene set enrichment analysis (dualGSEA); an R function that enables more robust biological discovery and pre-clinical model alignment from transcriptomics data.

Courtney Bull, Ryan M Byrne, Natalie C Fisher, Shania M Corry, Raheleh Amirkhah, Jessica Edwards, Lily V S Hillson, Mark Lawler, Aideen E Ryan, Felicity Lamrock and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Courtney BullThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Ryan M ByrneThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Natalie C FisherThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Shania M CorryThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Raheleh AmirkhahThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Jessica EdwardsThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Lily V S HillsonSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Mark LawlerThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Aideen E RyanDiscipline of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Felicity LamrockMathematical Sciences Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Philip D Dunne *The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. p.dunne@qub.ac.uk.
Sudhir B Malla *The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. s.malla@qub.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK A26825Cancer Research UK A29834Medical Research Council MC_PC_21042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) tools can identify biological insights within gene expression-based studies. Although their statistical performance has been compared, the downstream biological implications that arise when choosing between the range of pairwise or single sample forms of GSEA methods remain understudied. We compare the statistical and biological results obtained from various pre-ranking methods/options for pairwise GSEA, followed by a stand-alone comparison of GSEA, single sample GSEA (ssGSEA) and gene set variation analysis (GSVA). Pairwise GSEA and fGSEA provide similar results when deployed using a range of gene pre-ranking methods. However, pairwise GSEA can overgeneralise biological enrichment, as when the most statistically significant signatures were assessed using single sample approaches, there was a complete absence of biological distinction between these groups. To avoid these issues, we developed a new dualGSEA tool, which provides users with multiple statistics and visuals to aid interpretation of results. This new tool removes the possibility of users inadvertently interpreting statistical findings as equating to biological distinction between samples within groups-of-interest. dualGSEA provides a more robust basis for discovery research, one which allows user to compare both statistical significance alongside biological distinctions in their data.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansSoftwareComputational biologyGSEAMolecular classificationTranscriptional signatures

Identifiers

PMID39632911
PMCPMC11618328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.