ArticleScientific reports2024
Dual gene set enrichment analysis (dualGSEA); an R function that enables more robust biological discovery and pre-clinical model alignment from transcriptomics data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Promising Candidate Genes and Immune Infiltration Patterns in Chronic Schistosomiasis-Associated Liver Injury by WGCNA and Machine Learning.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identifying and validating of prognostic genes associated with myeloid cell differentiation in cervical cancer: development of a risk model based on single-cell RNA sequencing combined with bulk RNA sequencing data.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Acid Ceramidase Inhibition Disrupts Ceramide Homeostasis and Induces Mitochondrial Apoptosis in IDH1-Mutant Oligodendroglioma.Research square · 2026Article
- Targeted therapies reshape extracellular matrix remodeling and microenvironmental regulation in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Early Transcriptomic Response of Human Iris Stromal Cells During Herpes Simplex Virus Entry Reveals Interplay Between Cell Glycocalyx and Viral Exploitation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Biomaterial-mediated Cell Atlas: an insight from single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Transcriptomic profiles of endocrine-resistant breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Optimizing Model Performance and Interpretability: Application to Biological Data Classification.Genes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) tools can identify biological insights within gene expression-based studies. Although their statistical performance has been compared, the downstream biological implications that arise when choosing between the range of pairwise or single sample forms of GSEA methods remain understudied. We compare the statistical and biological results obtained from various pre-ranking methods/options for pairwise GSEA, followed by a stand-alone comparison of GSEA, single sample GSEA (ssGSEA) and gene set variation analysis (GSVA). Pairwise GSEA and fGSEA provide similar results when deployed using a range of gene pre-ranking methods. However, pairwise GSEA can overgeneralise biological enrichment, as when the most statistically significant signatures were assessed using single sample approaches, there was a complete absence of biological distinction between these groups. To avoid these issues, we developed a new dualGSEA tool, which provides users with multiple statistics and visuals to aid interpretation of results. This new tool removes the possibility of users inadvertently interpreting statistical findings as equating to biological distinction between samples within groups-of-interest. dualGSEA provides a more robust basis for discovery research, one which allows user to compare both statistical significance alongside biological distinctions in their data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.