Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632902›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Revolutionizing healthcare: a comparative insight into deep learning's role in medical imaging.

Vivek Kumar Prasad, Ashwin Verma, Pronaya Bhattacharya, Sheryal Shah, Subrata Chowdhury, Madhuri Bhavsar, Sheraz Aslam, Nouman Ashraf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vivek Kumar PrasadDepartment of CSE, Institute of Technology Nirma University, Ahemdabad, Gujarat, India.
Ashwin VermaDepartment of CSE, Institute of Technology Nirma University, Ahemdabad, Gujarat, India.
Pronaya BhattacharyaDepartment of CSE, Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Research and Innovation Cell, Amity University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sheryal ShahDepartment of CSE, Institute of Technology Nirma University, Ahemdabad, Gujarat, India.
Subrata ChowdhuryDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sreenivasa Institute of Technology and Management Studies, Chittoor, Andra Pradesh, India.
Madhuri BhavsarDepartment of CSE, Institute of Technology Nirma University, Ahemdabad, Gujarat, India.
Sheraz AslamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, and Informatics, Cyprus University of Technology, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus.
Nouman AshrafSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. nouman.ashraf@tudublin.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, Deep Learning (DL) models have shown promising accuracy in analysis of medical images. Alzeheimer Disease (AD), a prevalent form of dementia, uses Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, which is then analysed via DL models. To address the model computational constraints, Cloud Computing (CC) is integrated to operate with the DL models. Recent articles on DL-based MRI have not discussed datasets specific to different diseases, which makes it difficult to build the specific DL model. Thus, the article systematically explores a tutorial approach, where we first discuss a classification taxonomy of medical imaging datasets. Next, we present a case-study on AD MRI classification using the DL methods. We analyse three distinct models-Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG-16), and an ensemble approach-for classification and predictive outcomes. In addition, we designed a novel framework that offers insight into how various layers interact with the dataset. Our architecture comprises an input layer, a cloud-based layer responsible for preprocessing and model execution, and a diagnostic layer that issues alerts after successful classification and prediction. According to our simulations, CNN outperformed other models with a test accuracy of 99.285%, followed by VGG-16 with 85.113%, while the ensemble model lagged with a disappointing test accuracy of 79.192%. Our cloud Computing framework serves as an efficient mechanism for medical image processing while safeguarding patient confidentiality and data privacy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlzheimer DiseaseCloud ComputingDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerBlockchainChallengesInternet of thingsPatient dataSecurity & privacySmart healthcare

Identifiers

PMID39632902
PMCPMC11618441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.