Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632891›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Optimized dual-tree complex wavelet transform aided multimodal image fusion with adaptive weighted average fusion strategy.

Jampani Ravi, R Narmadha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jampani RaviDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Semmancheri, Chennai, 600119, India. jravi472@gmail.com.
R NarmadhaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Semmancheri, Chennai, 600119, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image fusion is generally utilized for retrieving significant data from a set of input images to provide useful informative data. Image fusion enhances the applicability and quality of data. Hence, the analysis of multimodal image fusion is a new to the research topic, which is designed by combining the images of multimodal into single image in order to preserveexact details. On the other hand, the existing approaches face challenges in the precise interpretation of source images, and also it have only captured local information without considering the wide range of information. To consider these weaknesses, a multimodal image fusion model is planned to develop according to the multi-resolution transform along with the optimization strategy. At first, the images are effectively analyzed from standard public datasets and further, the images given into the Optimized Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform (ODTCWT) to acquire low frequency and high frequency coefficients. Here, certain parameters in DTCWT get tuned with the hybridized heuristic strategy with the Probability of Fitness-based Honey Badger Squirrel Search Optimization (PF-HBSSO) to enhance the decomposition quality. Then, the fusion of high-frequency coefficients is performed using adaptive weighted average fusion technique, whereas the weights are optimized using PF-HBSSOto achieve the optimal fused results. Similarly, the low-frequency coefficients are combined by average fusion. Finally, the fused images undergo image reconstruction using the inverse ODTCWT. The experimental evaluation of the designed multimodal image fusion illustratessuperioritythat distinguishes this work from others.

Identifiers

PMID39632891
PMCPMC11618366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.