ArticleScientific reports2024
A low-cost, open-source cylindrical Couette rheometer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational metrology for materials.Journal of materials research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheology describes the flow of fluids from food and plastics, to coatings, adhesives, and 3D printing inks, and is commonly denoted by viscosity alone as a simplification. While viscometers adequately probe Newtonian (constant) viscosity, most fluids have complex viscosity, requiring tests over multiple shear rates, and transient measurements. As a result, rheometers are typically large, expensive, and require additional infrastructure (e.g., gas lines), rendering them inaccessible for regular use by many individuals, small organizations, and educators. Here, we introduce a low-cost (under USD$200 bill of materials) Open Source Rheometer (OSR), constructed entirely from thermoplastic 3D printed components and off-the-shelf electromechanical components. A sample fluid rests in a cup while a micro stepping motor rotates a tool inside the cup, applying strain-controlled shear flow. A loadcell measures reaction torque exerted on the cup, and viscosity is calculated. To establish the measurement range, the viscosity of four Newtonian samples of 0.1-10 Pa.s were measured with the OSR and compared to benchmark values from a laboratory rheometer, showing under 23% error. Building on this, flow curves of three complex fluids - a microgel (hand sanitizer), foam (Gillette), and biopolymer solution (1% Xanthan Gum) - were measured with a similar error range. Stress relaxation, a transient test, was demonstrated on the biopolymer solution to extract the nonlinear damping function. We finally include detailed exposition of measurement windows, sources of error, and future design suggestions. The OSR cost is ∼1/25th that of commercially available devices with comparable minimum torque (200 µN.m), and provides a fully open-source platform for further innovation in customized rheometry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.